Skip to content
Home » Project Management Topics » The Goldilocks Principle in Scrum Teams: Finding the Ideal Size

The Goldilocks Principle in Scrum Teams: Finding the Ideal Size

In the realm of Agile methodology, Scrum teams are the driving force behind successful project deliveries. But as with any team, there’s a ‘just right’ size that optimizes efficiency, collaboration, and productivity. So, what’s the ideal size for a Scrum team, and what happens when they become too large?

The Ideal Size:

Scrum advocates for small, cross-functional teams of 5 to 9 members, adhering to the ‘Two Pizza Rule’—a team should be small enough to be fed by two pizzas. This size fosters effective communication, collaboration, and agility.

The Pitfalls of a Large Scrum Team:

Communication Challenges:

As a Scrum team expands, communication becomes more complex. With more members, exchanging ideas, updates, and information can slow down, leading to miscommunication and inefficiencies.

Reduced Autonomy and Ownership:

Larger teams might struggle with individual accountability and ownership. It becomes harder to pinpoint who’s responsible for specific tasks or decisions, diluting the sense of ownership over deliverables.

Increased Coordination Overhead:

More members mean more coordination efforts. Scheduling meetings, aligning on tasks, and decision-making can become cumbersome, slowing down the overall progress.

Decline in Productivity:

A large team might suffer from decreased productivity due to increased bureaucracy, longer decision-making cycles, and difficulties in maintaining focus on the project’s objectives.

Enter the Scrum of Scrums:

Addressing the Challenge of Large Teams:

To mitigate the challenges posed by large Scrum teams, the concept of a ‘Scrum of Scrums’ (SoS) emerges as a solution.

What is Scrum of Scrums?

SoS is a method used to scale Scrum effectively for larger projects by breaking down larger teams into smaller, more manageable units. It involves representatives from different teams gathering periodically to synchronize their work.

Step-by-Step Implementation Guide:

1. Define the Need: Determine when the SoS is necessary. It’s typically implemented when multiple Scrum teams are working on interrelated tasks that impact each other.

2. Identify Representatives: Each team nominates a representative (usually the Scrum Master or a delegate) to attend the SoS meeting. These individuals act as ambassadors, conveying information and decisions between their respective teams and the SoS.

3. Establish Meeting Cadence: Set a regular schedule for the SoS meetings. Frequency may vary based on the project’s complexity but aim for a balance between staying informed and avoiding excessive interruptions.

4. Agenda Setting: Focus the agenda on critical topics—updates on progress, dependencies, impediments, and any adjustments required to ensure smooth collaboration.

5. Conducting the SoS Meeting: Keep the meeting concise yet comprehensive. Each representative shares their team’s updates, highlighting accomplishments, challenges, and dependencies.

6. Problem Solving: Identify and address impediments or dependencies that hinder progress across teams. Encourage collaborative problem-solving and seek resolutions collectively.

7. Action Items and Follow-ups: Document action items and decisions made during the meeting. Ensure follow-ups on commitments and track progress on resolving impediments.

8. Continuous Improvement: Regularly assess the effectiveness of the SoS meetings. Solicit feedback from team representatives and adapt the process to optimize collaboration further.

Benefits of Scrum of Scrums:

  • Improved Communication: SoS fosters better communication and alignment between multiple Scrum teams.
  • Focused Coordination: It streamlines the coordination efforts by allowing smaller groups to discuss interdependencies and resolve potential conflicts.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Each smaller team can maintain its autonomy and efficiency while collaborating with others on broader project objectives.

Conclusion:

In the world of Agile and Scrum, team size matters. While smaller Scrum teams often thrive due to enhanced communication and agility, larger teams can leverage the Scrum of Scrums framework to effectively scale their processes. Finding the ‘just right’ size ensures that teams remain nimble, focused, and efficient in delivering valuable outcomes—a key principle in the ever-evolving landscape of project management.

Salesforce project manager

Stand-Ups

The daily stand-up meeting, AKA ‘the daily scrum’, stands as a cornerstone for fostering communication, collaboration, and transparency within teams. 

Scaled agile RTE

Sprint Planning

Sprint planning is a cornerstone in Agile methodologies, serving as the roadmap for focused efforts within a specified timeframe, known as a Sprint.

Development Teams

In software development, adopting agile methodologies like Scrum has become a norm for achieving flexibility, efficiency, and faster delivery.